If you lose 50 pounds, do you buy some new clothes you’ll look great in, or walk around in saggy, baggy old ones?
If you finally pay off your car, do you spend that money elsewhere, or do you keep sending in that $500 check every month?
If your engagement is broken off, do you move on, or do you spend the rest of your life sitting in your wedding dress in front of your uneaten wedding cake, Miss Havisham style?
If you’re driving to Disney for a family vacation, do you stop when you reach Orlando, or do you keep going because there’s still gas in the tank?
If the federal government revokes Educator Effectiveness (an ineffective, time-consuming mandate that makes teachers feel like dogs chasing their own tails) do you revoke it at the state level as well, or do you keep it in place because, well, it’s in place?
So, here’s the thing. As you may have guessed, this last hypothetical is not a hypothetical.
In December, the United States Congress reauthorized No Child Left Behind Act (now called the Every Student Succeeds Act). The re-authorization included revoking the federal mandate for the Educator Effectiveness System. Yet, thanks to Wisconsin legislators, this highly problematic initiative remains law in the State of Wisconsin.
My question (and I believe the question of many Wisconsin educators) is: Why not buy new clothes, stop sending in extra car payments, take the wedding dress off, stop in Orlando, and why not bow out of a failing Educator Effectiveness System, which yields negligible results and diverts enormous amounts of time and resources that could be better spent in Wisconsin schools?
Anything less is nonsense.